(reposted from August 9, 2010)
I have never been to a Conference before in my life but for some reason I was blessed with the great fortune of attending not one but THREE during the last 30 days. They were all really different from one another in subject matter and all transformed my life significantly.
First was the 30th International Conference on Jewish Genealogy. I was Lynne Siegel’s special guest and am grateful to her and her unending generosity. Honestly, I didn’t even know there was a conference on Jewish genealogy . . . and a few years ago, I wouldn’t have taken the time to consider attending. I was too busy, blah, blah, blah. But since I was forced to undergo extensive treatments for breast cancer this past year . . .well, it’s a cliche, I know . . . but I am now “stopping to smell the roses” and reflect on my life a hell of a lot more. My father died when I was 12 years old and I know so little about him. He was Jewish, born in Poland in 1923, survived the Lodz Ghetto, Auschwitz, and a sanitarium in Davos, Switzerland, before he came to the U.S. in the 50s, married my mother in 1959 and died in Palm Springs in 1972, a broken and penniless man. These are the few elements of his life that I know for certain. I have fragments of stories but no real facts because I was too young for him to go into great detail before he died at age 49. His death left me without a father and a massive gaping hole about my heritage. Well, this conference opened my eyes to the fact that there are wonderful groups of people out there who can (finally!) help me piece together his life. In a lot of ways, this conference was heartbreaking and exceedingly emotional. I’d love to one day retrace my dad’s journey from his birth to his death and now I have the resources to help me. If I could only find the time and finances to do so. What a story that would be!
The second conference I attended was the exact opposite in nature to Jewish Genealogy. Comic-Con is as crazy as they say it is. 140,000+ participants in a 4 day span of time in quiet San Diego. A-List Movie and TV stars that you have to wait in long lines to see. My daughter and I were guests of James Seale and Kristine Blackport and I will forever be grateful to them for making one of Kate’s dreams come true. As for me, going to this crazy land of Comic-Con was never one of my dreams and, in fact, I’ve never been a huge of fan of comic-books, super heroes, science-fiction, or horror films. But by God, I got sucked into the vortex of it all and have a far greater appreciation for the ART of it than I ever thought I would. The stories, the illustrations, the depiction of the darker aspects of human nature – there is nothing COMIC about any of it. I found it all very vibrant and stimulating in an unexpected intelligent and emotional way. The artists who create this stuff are freaking brilliant and understand human beings. I was surprised at the theatricality of it all, too. Heroes and villains, war and destruction, good and evil, all for us to devour with passion.
I started to ponder – what makes a good actor for these kinds of projects? For the larger-than-life roles in comic-book related movies? Thor and Captain America and The Green Lantern. These actors need to be in great shape, studly and macho, for sure, but also sensitive, vulnerable and very appealing. And funny. Ryan Reynolds, Robert Downey, Jr., Daniel Craig. Also, must be facile with language. Only well-trained actors need apply.
What of the women in these projects? They have to be sexy, smart, physically very strong and yet soft. They have to be endowed with great bodies and the ability to do combat. They also have to be vulnerable and compassionate. Natalie Portman. Scarlett Johansson. Olivia Wilde. The embodiment of the ultimate fantasy.
Natalie Portman, who was there on the panel of Thor, made a kind of off-the-cuff comment about actors nowadays needing acting training with green screens, and I think that’s true. It goes back to Stanislavski’s “the magic if ” for goodness sake. Making up in your mind what is not there physically. You won’t work if you can’t do that successfully. Bad acting is horrible in these films (Brandon Routh in Superman Returns). It’s the actors job to make the unbelievable believable.
My experiences at Comic-Con covered a wide spectrum. Although I had a “professional guest pass” I didn’t get any preferential treatment. If I wanted to see a panel in Ballroom 20 or Hall H, I had to wait in a long, time-consuming line just like any other civilian. I waited 90+ minutes for the Showtime “Anti-Hero” panel (which was followed by the Dexter panel). David Duchovney, Mary Louise Parker, Michael C. Hall, and the creator/writers on their respective shows. And you know what? I loved it and it was worth the wait. Plus, I got to chat with a very cool graphic artist in line who I wouldn’t ordinarily have gotten a chance to meet. We talked about our love for Dexter and which season was the best so far (toss up between 1 & 4). I went with Kate to the panel of The Walking Dead, which is going to premiere on AMC in October. Kate is obsessed with the comic book written by Robert Kirkman that is the inspiration for the new series. On the surface, it’s a show about Zombies, which I ordinarily wouldn’t gravitate towards at all, but in reality, it’s a show about ordinary, good people who are related in some way (father-son, lovers, sisters), separated from each other by a terrible apocalypse. They must now find each other and reconnect amidst rumble and destruction and hundreds of Zombies who look pretty gruesome. Very cool. Great cast. Dark subject matter.
I went to a panel on Trauma as related to Heroes and Villains in Comic-Books. It was a group of psychiatrists and mental health professionals who pondered the following questions: What personal attributes will make someone either become a hero and or a villain after suffering a great trauma (death of a parent at an early age, loss of a limb, etc.)? What makes a person resilient? Non-resilient? Could the Dark Knight be “saved” with the right mental health treatment and/or good meds? This was a fascinating discussion and I didn’t have to wait 90 minutes to get in.
I almost got kicked out of the massive and overcrowded Exhibit Hall over a Dexter bag, but that’s a story for another time.
The third and final conference I went to was Theater Alive: Theater, Media and Survival. The Association of Theater of Higher Education’s 24th Annual Meeting. Basically, it was a gathering of a lot of hardworking and under-appreciated professors of theater from all over the country. I participated as a panelist at this one and didn’t have to wait on any lines at all. The panel I was fortunate enough to be a part of was formally titled “The Business of Acting: Equip Your Students with Critical Business and Survival Strategies for a Successful Career in Theater, Film and Television” and I have never felt more useful or revered as I did on this day. The generosity of spirit that was thrust upon me by the theater professors who were in that 8AM (!!) workshop was something that I will not easily forget . . .and that I should try to remember whenever I feel that no one really cares about what I do and what I think about constantly which is what is good acting? And how can one pursue it professionally without getting the soul sucked out of you?
These professors and acting teachers are the unsung heroes of the Biz. Without them, there would be no theater, movies and film because actors don’t just come out of the womb ready to perform. Even if one has a “natural talent,” you still need someone to find you and guide you along the way. Can you teach “talent”? If someone doesn’t have “it,” can they still be taught how to act? Well, that’s an ongoing debate . . ..but there is no question that there are talented young actors and they need to be enlightened and educated in the ART of acting. They need to be challenged, educated and inspired and that is what theater professors and teachers do.
The overriding question it seems to me is how can a traditional academic theater department reconcile teaching Chekhov while introducing the finer points of auditioning for a one-camera comedy such as The Office? The purity, if you will, of theater training should remain sacred, but the inclusion of sitcom technique should not be shunned. As I’ve said many, many times, a well-rounded actor will be a successful actor. Theater training is the best foundation for any actor and God knows an actor has to do theater to remain stimulated and alive, but he also needs to be able to do TV in order to make enough money to continue acting at all. In addition, an actor needs to be able to make commercial copy believable in order to make a lot of money with the least amount of time and effort. And why? In order to be able to do what he really loves, which is to play ‘Andre’ in Three Sisters. A successful actor does theater, film, TV, commercials, webseries, and corporate videos, and each aspect of this kind of career feeds off the other. University theater departments need to find a way to bridge the gap between the academic and the practical so that all parties can be happy, and I think that is happening.
It was extremely gratifying that the teachers I spoke with were excited to take the information and opinions I shared with them on the Business of Acting back to their students in their home towns.
Suzi Lori-Parks (Topdog/Underdog, 365 Plays in 365 Days) was the keynote speaker at this conference and I was very inspired by her humorous and unconventional speech. “Unconventional” in that she was not afraid to be goofy and obnoxious at times, in the spirit of play, with her sound effects into the microphone and her guttural grunts for emphasis as she expressed her precepts for a good life as an artist. The idea I loved the most was her credo that artists should create art every day. A writer should write every day. An actor should act every day. We are running a marathon here; not a sprint or the occasional run but a marathon that continues on and on until the day we die. That is how we get really, really good at something. That is how we succeed. That is how we touch other people’s lives.